Best Open Source Alternatives to AWS S3
TL;DR
MinIO entered maintenance mode in late 2025 after removing its web UI from the community edition and restricting core features to enterprise licenses. The best replacements depend on your use case: SeaweedFS for most production workloads (Apache 2.0, 30K stars, S3-compatible), Garage for geo-distributed multi-site setups (Rust, minimal resources), and Ceph RGW for enterprise-scale infrastructure (battle-tested, complex). AWS S3 itself remains the easiest option — this guide is for teams committed to self-hosting.
Key Takeaways
- MinIO went into maintenance mode (Dec 2025) after removing the web UI and key features from the community edition
- SeaweedFS is the top open source alternative for most teams — Apache 2.0, Go, ~30K stars, proven at scale
- Garage is purpose-built for geo-distributed self-hosting on modest hardware — ideal for 3+ nodes across locations
- Ceph RGW is the enterprise choice — battle-tested at petabyte scale, but operationally complex
- RustFS is an emerging Rust-based MinIO replacement — promising but newer
- All support the S3 API — your existing
aws-sdkcode, Boto3, or@aws-sdk/client-s3works without modification
What Happened to MinIO?
MinIO was the undisputed leader in self-hosted S3-compatible storage from 2016 to 2024. Then a series of decisions eroded its open source standing:
- 2021: Switched from Apache 2.0 to AGPLv3 license — commercial use now requires a paid license or code disclosure
- June 2025: Removed the web console (admin UI) from community edition — bucket management, lifecycle policies, and account administration became enterprise-only
- December 2025: GitHub repo entered maintenance mode — no new features, no pull requests, security fixes case-by-case only
This is a familiar pattern (HashiCorp, Elastic, MongoDB, Redis all followed the same trajectory). MinIO is still usable, but relying on it for new infrastructure is a risk.
Comparison Overview
| Project | Language | License | Stars | S3 Compat. | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeaweedFS | Go | Apache 2.0 | ~23K | Good | Most production workloads |
| Garage | Rust | AGPL 3.0 | ~4K | Core ops | Geo-distributed, low-resource |
| Ceph RGW | C++ | LGPL 2.1 | ~14K | Excellent | Enterprise / petabyte scale |
| RustFS | Rust | Apache 2.0 | ~4K | Good | MinIO drop-in (newer) |
| MinIO (legacy) | Go | AGPL 3.0 | ~53K | Excellent | (maintenance mode — avoid for new) |
SeaweedFS: The Best All-Around Alternative
SeaweedFS is a distributed file system that was built from the ground up for scalable object storage. It predates much of the "S3-alternative" wave and has earned its ~23,000 GitHub stars through real production deployments.
Why SeaweedFS
- Apache 2.0 license — no AGPL complexity, use freely in commercial products
- Written in Go — easy to build and operate, good performance
- S3-compatible gateway built-in — point your
aws-sdkat it and it just works - Scales horizontally — add volume servers as storage grows
- Handles both small and large files efficiently (a MinIO weakness)
- Active development — not going into maintenance mode
Architecture
SeaweedFS has three components:
Master Server (metadata) → Volume Servers (data) → Filer (S3 gateway)
For most self-hosters, a single-server deployment works fine:
# Start SeaweedFS on a single server:
docker run -d \
-p 9333:9333 \ # Master HTTP
-p 9334:9334 \ # Master gRPC
-p 8080:8080 \ # Volume server
-p 8888:8888 \ # Filer (S3 gateway)
-v /data/seaweedfs:/data \
chrislusf/seaweedfs:latest server \
-dir=/data \
-s3 \
-s3.port=8333 \
-s3.allowEmptyFolder=false
S3 API Compatibility
// Works with standard AWS SDK — just change the endpoint:
import { S3Client, PutObjectCommand } from '@aws-sdk/client-s3';
const s3 = new S3Client({
endpoint: 'http://your-server:8333',
region: 'us-east-1', // Required but unused
credentials: {
accessKeyId: 'your-access-key',
secretAccessKey: 'your-secret-key',
},
forcePathStyle: true, // Required for non-AWS S3
});
// Works exactly like AWS S3:
await s3.send(new PutObjectCommand({
Bucket: 'my-bucket',
Key: 'files/document.pdf',
Body: fileBuffer,
ContentType: 'application/pdf',
}));
Garage: Built for Geo-Distribution
Garage is a lightweight Rust-based object storage system designed specifically for scenarios that other S3 implementations handle poorly: multiple nodes across different geographic locations, unreliable network connections, and modest hardware.
Why Garage
- Designed for 3+ nodes across multiple sites — this is Garage's killer feature
- Extremely lightweight — runs on 1 GB RAM, 16 GB disk
- Built with partition tolerance — works across flaky inter-datacenter links
- No single point of failure — any node can be down and the cluster continues
Garage vs SeaweedFS
Garage is not a datacenter tool — it's a "real world" tool. If you want to run three nodes in three different cities (home lab + VPS + office), connected over regular internet, Garage handles this better than anything else.
SeaweedFS is better for single-datacenter or cloud deployments where network reliability is high. Garage is better for truly distributed setups.
Quick Start
# Three-node Garage cluster:
# Install on each node:
docker pull dxflrs/garage:v1.0.0
# Node 1 configuration:
cat > /etc/garage.toml << EOF
metadata_dir = "/var/lib/garage/meta"
data_dir = "/var/lib/garage/data"
db_engine = "lmdb"
replication_factor = 3
[rpc_secret]
secret = "$(openssl rand -hex 32)"
[rpc_bind_addr]
addr = "0.0.0.0:3901"
[s3_api]
s3_region = "garage"
api_bind_addr = "0.0.0.0:3900"
EOF
docker run -d --network host \
-v /etc/garage.toml:/etc/garage/garage.toml \
-v /var/lib/garage:/var/lib/garage \
dxflrs/garage:v1.0.0
S3 API Compatibility
Garage supports core S3 operations: GET, PUT, DELETE, LIST, multipart upload, presigned URLs. It does not implement every S3 feature (lifecycle policies, object tagging, bucket notifications are partial). Check Garage's compatibility table before adopting.
Ceph RGW: Enterprise-Scale
Ceph is the enterprise-grade distributed storage system used at petabyte scale in production by organizations including CERN. Ceph RGW (RADOS Gateway) is its S3-compatible interface.
Why Ceph
- Battle-tested at petabyte scale — the most proven distributed storage system in existence
- Excellent S3 compatibility — closest to full AWS S3 feature parity
- LGPL 2.1 license — permissive, widely used in commercial deployments
- CNCF project — no single-vendor license risk
Why Not Ceph
- Operationally complex — Ceph is not a weekend project. Plan for a week to set up properly and ongoing time to maintain
- Heavyweight — minimum 3 nodes, 4+ GB RAM per node, complex networking
- Learning curve — the documentation is extensive and the mental model is different from simpler tools
For small teams and self-hosters, SeaweedFS or Garage are better fits. Ceph is for teams with dedicated infrastructure engineers.
RustFS: The Emerging MinIO Drop-In
RustFS is a new Rust-based S3-compatible object store with an explicit goal of being a drop-in MinIO replacement. As of 2026 it has ~4K stars and is gaining traction post-MinIO maintenance mode announcement.
Why Consider RustFS
- Apache 2.0 license — clean, commercial-friendly
- Written in Rust — excellent memory safety and performance characteristics
- Designed as MinIO drop-in — existing MinIO configurations should migrate easily
- Active development — community is growing post-MinIO announcement
Caveat
RustFS is newer and less battle-tested than SeaweedFS. For new production deployments today, SeaweedFS has more production validation. Watch RustFS over the next 12 months.
Decision Guide
Choose SeaweedFS if:
→ Single datacenter or cloud VPS deployment
→ Apache 2.0 license required (no AGPL)
→ Need proven production track record
→ Mixed file sizes (small files + large objects)
→ Want Go-based tooling
Choose Garage if:
→ Multiple nodes across different geographic locations
→ Home lab / edge / low-resource nodes
→ Inter-node network is unreliable
→ Want minimal resource footprint
Choose Ceph RGW if:
→ Petabyte-scale storage requirements
→ Dedicated infrastructure team
→ Need maximum S3 feature parity
→ Enterprise environment with compliance requirements
Still use MinIO if:
→ Already deployed and working — no need to migrate immediately
→ Using enterprise license (supported going forward)
→ Limited operational capacity to migrate
Use AWS S3 / Cloudflare R2 if:
→ Don't want to manage storage infrastructure at all
→ R2 has zero egress fees and is very cost-competitive
→ Team prioritizes managed over self-hosted
Migration from MinIO to SeaweedFS
If you're currently on MinIO and want to migrate:
# Use rclone to copy between S3-compatible stores:
# First, configure both remotes in ~/.config/rclone/rclone.conf:
[minio-source]
type = s3
provider = Minio
endpoint = http://old-minio:9000
access_key_id = minioadmin
secret_access_key = minioadmin
[seaweedfs-dest]
type = s3
provider = Other
endpoint = http://new-seaweedfs:8333
access_key_id = your-key
secret_access_key = your-secret
force_path_style = true
# Copy all buckets:
rclone sync minio-source: seaweedfs-dest: --progress
Update your application's S3 endpoint environment variable and your existing code continues working without changes.
Methodology
- MinIO maintenance mode: InfoQ report, community GitHub discussions (December 2025)
- SeaweedFS: github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs, Apache 2.0, ~23K stars
- Garage: garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr, active community, Rust
- Benchmark data: repoflow.io/blog
See all open source cloud storage alternatives at OSSAlt.com/alternatives/aws-s3.